Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Apr 24, 2014 in General News

The Guardian: Marshall Islands sues nine nuclear powers over their failure to disarm

Julian Borger, diplomatic editor, The Guardian, Thursday 24 April, 2014/

 

 

In the unprecedented legal action, comprising nine separate cases

brought before the ICJ on Thursday, the Republic of the Marshall Islands

accuses the nuclear weapons states of a “flagrant denial of human

justice”. It argues it is justified in taking the action because of the

harm it suffered as a result of the nuclear arms race.

 

The Pacific chain of islands, including Bikini Atoll and Enewetak, was

the site of 67 nuclear tests from 1946 to 1958, including the “Bravo

shot”, a 15-megaton device equivalent to a thousand Hiroshima blasts,

detonated in 1954. The Marshallese islanders say they have been

suffering serious health and environmental effects ever since.

 

The island republic is suing the five “established” nuclear weapons

states recognised in the 1968 nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT)

<http://www.theguardian.com/world/non-proliferation-treaty-npt>– the US,

Russia (which inherited the Soviet arsenal), China, France and the UK –

as well as the three countries outside the NPT who have declared nuclear

arsenals – India, Pakistan and North Korea, and the one undeclared

nuclear weapons state, Israel.

 

The NPT, which came into force in 1970 is essentially a compact between

the non-weapon states, who pledged to not to acquire nuclear weapons,

and the weapons states, who in return undertook to disarm under article

VI of the treaty.

 

Although the size of the arsenals are sharply down from the height of

the cold war, the Marshall Islands’ legal case notes there remain more

than 17,000 warheads in existence, 16,000 of them owned by Russia and

the US – enough to destroy all life on the planet.

 

“The long delay in fulfilling the obligations enshrined in article VI of

the NPT constitutes a flagrant denial of human justice,” the court

documents say.

 

The Marshall Islands case draws attention to the fact that the weapons

states are currently in the process of modernising their nuclear

weapons, which it portrays as a clear violation of the NPT.

 

The case against Britain, which has an estimated total inventory of 225

warheads and is in the process of replacing its submarine-launched

Trident arsenal, states that: “The UK has not pursued in good faith

negotiations to cease the nuclear arms race at an early date through

comprehensive nuclear disarmament or other measures, and instead is

taking actions to improve its nuclear weapons system and to maintain it

for the indefinite future.”

 

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament’s general secretary, Kate Hudson,

said: “The nuclear-armed states continue to peddle the myth that they

are committed to multilateral disarmament initiatives, while squandering

billions to modernise their nuclear arsenals. The UK government’s plans

to replace Trident make a mockery of its professed belief in

multilateral frameworks – and now in addition to huge public opposition

in the UK, it will also face an international legal challenge to expose

its hypocrisy.”